January 2011 Archives by author

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Tue Jan 4 14:31:03 EDT 2011
Ending: Mon Jan 31 12:06:45 EDT 2011
Messages: 98

• [SIPForum-techwg] Are we done yet? Please !!   Bernard Aboba
• [SIPForum-techwg] Comment on v22 - text on IPv6   Bernard Aboba
• [SIPForum-techwg] Comments on SIPconnect1.1 V23   Bernard Aboba
• [SIPForum-techwg] Bernard's comment on T.38 relay   Bernard Aboba
• [SIPForum-techwg] Bernard's comment on T.38 relay   Bernard Aboba
• [SIPForum-techwg] Bernard's comment on T.38 relay   Bernard Aboba
• [SIPForum-techwg] Would around 12 noon on monday work for a quickcall?   Bernard Aboba
• [SIPForum-techwg] Bernard's comment on TLS   Bernard Aboba
• [SIPForum-techwg] Bernard's comment on TLS   Bernard Aboba
• [SIPForum-techwg] Bernard's comment on T.38 relay   Bernard Aboba
• [SIPForum-techwg] SIPConnect 1.1 Ballot - Approve   Bernard Aboba
• [SIPForum-techwg] SIPConnect 1.1 Ballot - Approve   Bernard Aboba
• [SIPForum-techwg] Bernard's comment on T.38 relay   Jack Burton
• [SIPForum-techwg] Ballot Response   Jack Burton
• [SIPForum-techwg] SIPConnect 1.1 Ballot - Approve   Jack Burton
• [SIPForum-techwg] Comment on v22 - text on IPv6   Spencer Dawkins
• [SIPForum-techwg] Comment on v22 - text on IPv6   Spencer Dawkins
• [SIPForum-techwg] Comment on v22 - section 14.5 on fax calls   Spencer Dawkins
• [SIPForum-techwg] SIPconnect 1.1 v23 (clean copy)   Spencer Dawkins
• [SIPForum-techwg] SIPconnect 1.1 v23 (the whole sordid story)   Spencer Dawkins
• [SIPForum-techwg] Possible need for clarification in 16.1.1.1 or16.1.2.2   Spencer Dawkins
• [SIPForum-techwg] Call flow diagrams with re-INVITEs   Spencer Dawkins
• [SIPForum-techwg] SIPconnect 1.1 v23 (the whole sordid story)   Spencer Dawkins
• [SIPForum-techwg] A couple of late editorials   Spencer Dawkins
• [SIPForum-techwg] SIPconnect 1.1 v24 (delta)   Spencer Dawkins
• [SIPForum-techwg] Bernard's comment on T.38 relay   Spencer Dawkins
• [SIPForum-techwg] Would around 12 noon on monday work for a quickcall?   Spencer Dawkins
• [SIPForum-techwg] Bernard's comment on T.38 relay   Spencer Dawkins
• [SIPForum-techwg] Bernard's comment on T.38 relay   Spencer Dawkins
• [SIPForum-techwg] Bernard's comment on T.38 relay   Spencer Dawkins
• [SIPForum-techwg] SIPconnect 1.1 v25 (delta)   Spencer Dawkins
• [SIPForum-techwg] SIPconnect 1.1 v25 (clean)   Spencer Dawkins
• [SIPForum-techwg] SIPconnect 1.1 v26 (clean, for balloting)   Spencer Dawkins
• [SIPForum-techwg] Comment on v22 - text on IPv6   Elwell, John
• [SIPForum-techwg] Comment on v22 - lack of clarity in section 8.1   Elwell, John
• [SIPForum-techwg] Comment on v22 - obligation to deal with different certificate validation options   Elwell, John
• [SIPForum-techwg] Comment on v22 - types of URI in From from SP-SSE to SIP-PBX   Elwell, John
• [SIPForum-techwg] Comment on v22 - provisioning with domain name for static mode   Elwell, John
• [SIPForum-techwg] Comment on v22 - use of OPTIONS request for keep-alive in static mode   Elwell, John
• [SIPForum-techwg] Comment on v22 - text on IPv6   Elwell, John
• [SIPForum-techwg] SC1.1 v22 comment on RBT vs. Early Media   Elwell, John
• [SIPForum-techwg] Packet rate issue   Elwell, John
• [SIPForum-techwg] Comments on v23   Elwell, John
• [SIPForum-techwg] Possible need for clarification in 16.1.1.1 or 16.1.2.2   Elwell, John
• [SIPForum-techwg] Possible need for clarification in 16.1.1.1 or16.1.2.2   Elwell, John
• [SIPForum-techwg] A couple of late editorials   Elwell, John
• [SIPForum-techwg] Blind Transfer in v20   Elwell, John
• [SIPForum-techwg] SIPconnect 1.1 v23 (the whole sordid story)   Elwell, John
• [SIPForum-techwg] Blind Transfer in v20   Elwell, John
• [SIPForum-techwg] Bernard's comment on T.38 relay   Elwell, John
• [SIPForum-techwg] Bernard's comment on TLS   Elwell, John
• [SIPForum-techwg] Bernard's comment on T.38 relay   Elwell, John
• [SIPForum-techwg] Bernard's comment on T.38 relay   Elwell, John
• [SIPForum-techwg] Bernard's comment on T.38 relay   Elwell, John
• [SIPForum-techwg] Bernard's comment on T.38 relay   Elwell, John
• [SIPForum-techwg] Blind Transfer in v20   Elwell, John
• [SIPForum-techwg] Bernard's comment on T.38 relay   Elwell, John
• [SIPForum-techwg] Bernard's comment on TLS   Elwell, John
• [SIPForum-techwg] Bernard's comment on T.38 relay   Elwell, John
• [SIPForum-techwg] Bernard's comment on T.38 relay   Elwell, John
• [SIPForum-techwg] SIPconnect 1.1 v25 (delta)   Elwell, John
• [SIPForum-techwg] SIPConnect 1.1 Ballot - Approve   Elwell, John
• [SIPForum-techwg] Blind Transfer in v20   Grzenda, Jay
• [SIPForum-techwg] Blind Transfer in v20   Grzenda, Jay
• [SIPForum-techwg] SC1.1 v22 comment on RBT vs. Early Media   David Hancock
• [SIPForum-techwg] Comments on SIPconnect1.1 V23   David Hancock
• [SIPForum-techwg] Blind Transfer in v20   David Hancock
• [SIPForum-techwg] Bernard's comment on T.38 relay   David Hancock
• [SIPForum-techwg] Blind Transfer in v20   David Hancock
• [SIPForum-techwg] Resolution of call-fwding question   David Hancock
• [SIPForum-techwg] Bernard's comment on T.38 relay   David Hancock
• [SIPForum-techwg] SIPconnect1.1 Ballot -- Approve   David Hancock
• [SIPForum-techwg] Blind Transfer in v20   Horvath, Ernst
• [SIPForum-techwg] SIPConnect 1.1 Ballot - Approve   Johnston, Alan B (Alan)
• [SIPForum-techwg] SIPConnect 1.1 Ballot - Approve   Hadriel Kaplan
• [SIPForum-techwg] SIPconnect 1.1 v23 (the whole sordid story)   Brian Lindsay
• [SIPForum-techwg] Blind Transfer in v20   Brian Lindsay
• [SIPForum-techwg] SIP Forum Launches SIPNOC -- A New Conference for SIP Network Operators   Marc Robins
• [SIPForum-techwg] Official SIPNOC Call For Presentations   Marc Robins
• [SIPForum-techwg] SIP Forum Announces FCC Chief Technologist Dr. Douglas C. Sicker Keynote Speaker for Inaugural SIPNOC Event   Marc Robins
• [SIPForum-techwg] Blind Transfer in v20   Doug Sauder
• [SIPForum-techwg] Call flow diagrams with re-INVITEs   Doug Sauder
• [SIPForum-techwg] Nits in SC v24   Doug Sauder
• [SIPForum-techwg] Are we done yet? Please !!   Richard Shockey
• [SIPForum-techwg] FW: Conference Call Confirmation Jan 7   Richard Shockey
• [SIPForum-techwg] FW: Conference Call Confirmation Jan 14   Richard Shockey
• [SIPForum-techwg] The road to closure for 1.1   Richard Shockey
• [SIPForum-techwg] Proposed Text for SIPFORUM TGLC - SIPconnect 1.1 v 2x Ballot and Process information   Richard Shockey
• [SIPForum-techwg] Would around 12 noon on monday work for a quick call?   Richard Shockey
• [SIPForum-techwg] Would around 12 noon on monday work for a quickcall?   Richard Shockey
• [SIPForum-techwg] FW: Conference Call Confirmation - Resolution of TLS issues   Richard Shockey
• [SIPForum-techwg] Bernard's comment on T.38 relay   Richard Shockey
• [SIPForum-techwg] Bernard's comment on T.38 relay   Richard Shockey
• [SIPForum-techwg] Bernard's comment on T.38 relay   Richard Shockey
• [SIPForum-techwg] Bernard's comment on T.38 relay   Richard Shockey
• [SIPForum-techwg] SIP Forum SIP Connect Task Group Last Call Second Ballot on document version V26   Richard Shockey
• [SIPForum-techwg] SIP Connect 1.1 v26 Ballot Review   Richard Shockey
• [SIPForum-techwg] FW: [martini] Protocol Action: 'Registration for Multiple Phone Numbers in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-martini-gin-13.txt)   Richard Shockey

Last message date: Mon Jan 31 12:06:45 EDT 2011
Archived on: Mon Jan 31 12:07:01 EDT 2011

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...