[SIPForum-techwg] Can we please have at least one real codec

[Cullen Jennings]

Well I'm not saying remove g711 - the fax / modem stuff would go as  
usual with 711

On Feb 12, 2009, at 9:54 AM, Richard Shockey wrote:

> Remember G729 kills the way some SSP's have to deal with FAX if they  
> can't
> support T.38. It just perpetrates the number of DS0's.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: techwg-bounces at sipforum.org [mailto:techwg- 
>> bounces at sipforum.org]
>> On Behalf Of Cullen Jennings
>> Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 11:22 AM
>> To: DOLLY, MARTIN C, ATTLABS
>> Cc: techwg at sipforum.org
>> Subject: Re: [SIPForum-techwg] Can we please have at least one real
>> codec
>>
>>
>> On Feb 12, 2009, at 5:03 AM, DOLLY, MARTIN C, ATTLABS wrote:
>>
>>> G729b, but we would have to clearly define the codec negotiation, as
>>> it is a source of interop problems
>>
>> I may be very wrong about this - someone that operated big 729
>> networks would have a better idea. But I think most of theses interop
>> problems have been sorted out at this point. But 100% agree with
>> Martin that we would need to make sure we nailed this down carefully
>> in the spec as it has been a problem in the past .
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> techwg mailing list
>> Send mail to: techwg at sipforum.org
>> Unsubscribe or edit options at:
>> http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/techwg
>