[SIPForum-techwg] Can we please have at least one real codec

Jack Burton jsburton at cablevision.com
Thu Feb 12 13:05:37 EST 2009


Bandwidth per call is getting cheaper all the time.
 
I think mandating a codec that makes VOIP calls sound inferior to TDM calls will bring at least as much ridicule as one using more bandwidth.
 
If we mandate any codec at all, we should only require G.711.   G.711 is the only codec that is supported in virtually every endpoint/gateway and is royalty-free.
 
-Jack

>>> Cullen Jennings <fluffy at cisco.com> 2/12/2009 01:28 >>>

Bandwidth for call is expensive - we want a T1 VoIP line to support  
more calls, not less calls that a T1 PRI line. I think we have to  
require codec that uses less bandwidth than 711 or the whole thing  
will just be made fun of by the marketing departments of PSTN  
providers. I'm not saying people have to use this codec, but I think  
it has to be implemented on both sides.

_______________________________________________
techwg mailing list
Send mail to: techwg at sipforum.org 
Unsubscribe or edit options at:  http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/techwg

--------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted in this email and any of its attachments is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Cablevision proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Cablevision. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you received this in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete and destroy the communication and all of the attachments you have received and all copies thereof.
--------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://sipforum.org/pipermail/techwg/attachments/20090212/176fae0b/attachment.html 


More information about the techwg mailing list