[SIPForum-techwg] SIPconnect/1.1: draft v05 - Section 17.2
SBharrat at sonusnet.com
Thu Apr 9 12:09:59 EDT 2009
So if I understood Bernard's description properly, the wording for
the verification/validation is backwards... I think it should be:
The SP-SSE MUST provide a certification and the SIP-PBX MUST validate
and SHOULD (MAY??) verify a received certificate. Validation steps
include verifying (checking?) that the certificate has not expired,
that the issuing ... Verification steps include checking the status of
the certificate as well as the status of all the certificates
in the certificate chain using certificate revocation lists...
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bharrat, Shaun
> Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 12:01 PM
> To: 'Spencer Dawkins'; techwg at sipforum.org
> Subject: RE: [SIPForum-techwg] SIPconnect/1.1: draft v05 - Section 15
> Regarding the question on the conf call for this section,
> some text originally suggested by David Hancock seems appropriate.
> "If an originating session is an emergency session, then the
> session limits in this section do not apply."
> I would also suggest the following note along with that
> sentence. Note that this does not preclude the Service
> Provider network from rejecting the emergency call for other
> reasons including local congestion or limits explicitly
> applicable for emergency calls.
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: techwg-bounces at sipforum.org
> > [mailto:techwg-bounces at sipforum.org] On Behalf Of Spencer Dawkins
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 11:06 PM
> > To: techwg at sipforum.org
> > Subject: [SIPForum-techwg] SIPconnect/1.1: draft v05
> > For the telechat on Thursday...
> > Spencer
More information about the techwg