[SIPForum-techwg] Feedback on bootstrapping

Sumanth Channabasappa sumanth at cablelabs.com
Fri Sep 26 19:18:16 EDT 2008


Folks,

Martin and I discussed the action item regarding the support for
bootstrapping within the SIP configuration framework
(http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sipping-config-framework-15). 

Based on previous discussions, the understanding is that bootstrapping
involves two aspects:
A. How does the client figure out where it needs to go for initial
configuration?
B. How is it provided with identities and credentials for initial
authentication and authorization, if required?


The SIP configuration framework currently includes text to address the
above, but stops short of mandating or recommending specific solutions. 

Section 5.3.1 of the document provides various ways in which a client
can be bootstrapped with identities and credentials: pre-configuration,
out-of-band, end-user-interface as well as using the framework. Within
each of these options it provides some guidance, e.g., one can use X.509
certificates for identifying the client requesting initial configuration
(without pre-configuration when a PKI is used) or an end-user can
provide the necessary information. These methods can be used for both A
and B, above. 

Additionally, it also provides sample scenarios on a per-profile basis.
For example, the local-network profile in Section 5.1.4.1 allows for the
device to obtain a domain name via DHCP. This can be helpful in the case
of enterprise clients where the DHCP server can be influenced by the
service provider. Once this is obtained, the resulting configuration can
provide all the other details.

Martin and I agree that given the scope of the SIP configuration
framework, this is sufficient guidance. Implementations are going to use
one or more of the proposed methods, and the framework will support it.
We validated this by discussing a few planned deployments (that we are
aware of) and the framework meets the needs of the scenarios we came up
with. 

---

In addition to what Martin and I discussed, this group can potentially
take the guidelines within the framework and create a subset of
procedures for reasons such as interoperability. This would be
independent of the action item we took. 

We can discuss both the summary, and other related work on Monday.

Thanks!
- S








More information about the techwg mailing list