[SIPForum-techwg] On loose routing

[Jamie Palmer]

One of the bigger changes in the signaling flow - even for basic calls -
in the current SIPConnect 1.1 draft vs. SIPConnect 1.0 is the
requirement for loose routing.  This was proposed by both BroadSoft and
CableLabs.  Coupled with the support for implicit registrations - this
solves one of the biggest issues we've seen in the field - specifically
- how to properly support DID over a SIPConnect interface without
requiring a unique "registration" for each number.   I'm surprised this
didn't raise more discussion - and I hope it wasn't because it was
overlooked.  Perhaps we could make sure we touch on this topic during
the agenda this week.  

 

Regards,
JBP

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://sipforum.org/pipermail/techwg/attachments/20080923/fd16c9ca/attachment-0001.html