February 2006 Archives by subject

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Thu Feb 2 16:09:53 EDT 2006
Ending: Tue Feb 28 19:30:28 EDT 2006
Messages: 44

• [SIPForum-techwg] comment on section 5 of draft v4   Horvath, Ernst
• [SIPForum-techwg] comment on section 5 of draft v4   Hadriel Kaplan
• [SIPForum-techwg] comments to draft v4   Klaus Darilion
• [SIPForum-techwg] comments to draft v4   Richard Shockey
• [SIPForum-techwg] comments to draft v4   Francois Audet
• [SIPForum-techwg] comments to draft v4   Chris Sibley
• [SIPForum-techwg] comments to draft v4   Chris Sibley
• [SIPForum-techwg] comments to draft v4   Chris Sibley
• [SIPForum-techwg] comments to draft v4   Klaus Darilion
• [SIPForum-techwg] comments to draft v4   Chris Sibley
• [SIPForum-techwg] Comments to draft v4 - NAT/Firewall   Janne Magnusson
• [SIPForum-techwg] Comments to draft v4 - NAT/Firewall   Francois Audet
• [SIPForum-techwg] Comments to draft v4 - NAT/Firewall   Chris Sibley
• [SIPForum-techwg] Comments to draft v4 - NAT/Firewall   Francois Audet
• [SIPForum-techwg] Comments to draft v4 - NAT/Firewall   Janne Magnusson
• [SIPForum-techwg] Comments to draft v4 - NAT/Firewall   Chris Sibley
• [SIPForum-techwg] comments to draft v4: remarks on scope   Horvath, Ernst
• [SIPForum-techwg] comments to draft v4: terminal issues   Horvath, Ernst
• [SIPForum-techwg] Documenting Interoperable Instances ?   Richard Shockey
• [SIPForum-techwg] Re: Documenting Interoperable Instances ?   Jay Batson
• [SIPForum-techwg] Re: Documenting Interoperable Instances ?   Richard Shockey
• [SIPForum-techwg] Re: Documenting Interoperable Instances ?   Jay Batson
• [SIPForum-techwg] Draft v4 comments   Hadriel Kaplan
• [SIPForum-techwg] Draft v4 comments part 2   Hadriel Kaplan
• [SIPForum-techwg] Finalizing the work on IP-PBX to SP Integration - Final Comment period begins now.   Richard Shockey
• [SIPForum-techwg] Niall Gallagher/Kan/Mitel is out of the office.   Niall_Gallagher at Mitel.com
• [SIPForum-techwg] Proposed March 1 cut off date for forcomments.Proposed Sechedule for finalizing the work on IP-PBXto SP Integration   Stumer, Peggy (Com US)
• [SIPForum-techwg] Proposed March 1 cut off date for forcomments.Proposed Sechedule for finalizing the work on IP-PBXto SP Integration   Jay Batson
• [SIPForum-techwg] Proposed March 1 cut off date for forcomments.Proposed Sechedule for finalizing the work on IP-PBXto SP Integration   Dolly, Martin C, ALABS
• [SIPForum-techwg] Proposed March 1 cut off date for forcomments.Proposed Sechedule for finalizing the work on IP-PBXto SP Integration   Jay Batson
• [SIPForum-techwg] Proposed March 1 cut off date for for comments.Proposed Sechedule for finalizing the work on IP-PBX to SP Integration   Chris Gatch
• [SIPForum-techwg] Proposed March 1 cut off date for for comments.Proposed Sechedule for finalizing the work on IP-PBX to SP Integration   Chris Sibley
• [SIPForum-techwg] Proposed March 1 cut off date for for comments.Proposed Sechedule for finalizing the work on IP-PBX to SP Integration   Francois Audet
• [SIPForum-techwg] Proposed March 1 cut off date for for comments. Proposed Sechedule for finalizing the work on IP-PBX to SP Integration   Jay Batson
• [SIPForum-techwg] Proposed March 1 cut off date for for comments. Proposed Sechedule for finalizing the work on IP-PBX to SP Integration   Richard Shockey
• [SIPForum-techwg] Proposed March 1 cut off date for for comments. Proposed Sechedule for finalizing the work on IP-PBX to SP Integration   Richard Shockey
• [SIPForum-techwg] question on section 6 of draft v4, and nits   Horvath, Ernst
• [SIPForum-techwg] Reminder - Final Comment period begins now on IP-PBX to SP interface.   Richard Shockey
• [SIPForum-techwg] REMINDER- Final Comment period for IP-PBX to SP Interface ends March 1   Richard Shockey
• [SIPForum-techwg] Re: Should the use of p-Asserted idenity beprefered ?   Joanne McMillen
• [SIPForum-techwg] RE: Should the use of p-Asserted idenity be prefered ?   Chris Sibley
• [SIPForum-techwg] Re: Should the use of p-Asserted idenity be prefered ?   Richard Shockey
• [SIPForum-techwg] Should the use of p-Asserted idenity be prefered ?   Richard Shockey
• [SIPForum-techwg] SIP is back....   Amanda Campbell

Last message date: Tue Feb 28 19:30:28 EDT 2006
Archived on: Sat Dec 9 19:03:12 EDT 2006

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...